What are the distinctions among sins of incontinence, violence, and fraud?

The distinction among sins of incontinence, violence, and fraud is effectively captured in the answer. Incontinence refers to a lack of self-control, particularly in yielding to base desires or impulses, which leads to actions that violate moral or ethical standards without premeditation. This type of sin arises from weakness rather than malice; individuals succumb to temptation, making it a less deliberate form of wrongdoing.

Violence, on the other hand, entails directly harming others, whether physically or emotionally. This sin is characterized by aggression and intentional acts that inflict pain or suffering upon others, showing a clear intent to do wrong.

Fraud involves deceit and manipulation, where an individual misleads others for personal gain. This type of sin reflects a calculated effort to violate trust, often involving more complex reasoning and premeditated actions compared to incontinence or violence.

Each category illustrates different aspects of moral failure, with incontinence lacking control, violence causing harm, and fraud involving dishonesty. This framework emphasizes the varying ways individuals can err, as well as the differing impacts those sins have on both the sinner and society.